PCC candidate queries paltry interpreting bill

PCC candidate queries paltry interpreting bill

This May sees a whole slew of elections to local councils, the Welsh Assembly, Scottish Parliament and last but not least, 41 local Police & Crime Commissioners (PCCs).

Will Windsor-Clive looking dapperAs regards the election of the PCC for Gloucestershire, Will Windsor-Clive, the Conservative candidate, has decided to play the bigotry and xenophobia card early. He’s doing so by questioning the £100,000 the force spends annually on interpreters, having filed a Freedom of Information Act request on the subject, the Western Daily Press reports.

The paper reports the overall costs have remained around £100,000 a year over the three years between 2011 and 2014.

In a quote for the paper, Mr Windsor-Clive is reported to have commented: “This is an unseen cost of high levels of immigration. Taxpayers quite rightly want their money spent on keeping their community safe, not on providing translating services. I’m determined to find ways of cutting back-office costs to spend on frontline policing and this is one area that needs investigating.”

Here are a number of questions electors (and others) should ask Mr Windsor-Clive.

1. Is it right to whip up bigotry and xenophobia for electoral gain?

2. Does Mr Windsor-Clive regard the rule of law and the administration of justice as priceless commodities in a civilised society?

3. If the answer to 2. above is yes, wouldn’t any reasonable person regard £100,000 a reasonable price to pay to enable the full participation of both victims and accused persons who don’t speak English proficiently in the enforcement of the rule of law and the administration of justice?

4. If Mr Windsor-Clive were to fall foul of the police in a foreign country whose language he did not speak, would he be content to forego the services of an interpreter, as he obviously wants to do in Gloucestershire?

Author: Steve Woods

Generic carbon-based humanoid life form.